Smart Village Initiative in Indonesia: Governance’s Perspective Using PESTLE Analysis

Sukmo Pinuji; Novita Dian Lestari; Muhamad Irfan  Yudhistira

doi:10.31292/jta.v7i3.311

Authors

Sukmo Pinuji Technical University of Munich, Germany
Novita Dian Lestari Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Muhamad Irfan Yudhistira Department of Information Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v7i3.311

Keywords:

Smart Village, Parcel-Based Information System, PESTLE

Abstract

Globally, including in Indonesia, people have adopted the Smart Village Initiative. Although beneficial, the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) creates complexity in rural areas. The implementation of Smart Village varies due to different geographic, demographic, economic, and social backgrounds. Land-based implementations overcome challenges due to the dynamic nature of spatial data and attributes associated with land parcels, requiring an understanding of surveying as well as mapping for data updates and maintenance. This research aims to understand how these variations influence the implementation of smart villages and identify factors that impact the initiative. Using a comparative study approach, we analyzed the implementation of the Smart Village initiative in two different areas and assessed the results using the PESTLE analysis tool. The findings show that economic and social factors play an important role in shaping the design characteristics of the Smart Village, thereby creating significant differences between the two villages. These factors shape the inclusion of specific modules in the application. However, both face challenges related to community involvement, ICT culture, and environmental factors, which have an impact on optimizing utilization to achieve wider coverage and awareness in ICT adaptation.

Inisiatif Desa Cerdas diadopsi secara global, termasuk di Indonesia. Meskipun bermanfaat, integrasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) menimbulkan kompleksitas di pedesaan. Penerapan Smart Village bervariasi karena latar belakang geografis, demografi, ekonomi, dan sosial yang berbeda. Implementasi berbasis tanah menghadapi tantangan karena sifat dinamis dari data spasial dan atribut yang terkait dengan bidang tanah, sehingga membutuhkan pemahaman survei serta pemetaan untuk pembaruan dan pemeliharaan data. Penelitian ini berupaya untuk memahami bagaimana variasi-variasi tersebut mempengaruhi pelaksanaan inisiatif Desa Cerdas dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memberikan dampak terhadap inisiatif tersebut. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi komparatif, kami menganalisis implementasi inisiatif Desa Cerdas di dua bidang berbeda dan menilai hasilnya dengan menggunakan alat analisis PESTLE. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa faktor ekonomi dan sosial memainkan peran penting dalam membentuk karakteristik desain Desa Cerdas, sehingga menciptakan pembeda yang signifikan antara kedua desa tersebut. Faktor-faktor ini terutama mempengaruhi modul spesifik mana yang akan disertakan dalam aplikasi. Namun keduanya menghadapi tantangan terkait keterlibatan masyarakat, budaya TIK, dan faktor lingkungan, yang berdampak pada optimalisasi pemanfaatan untuk mencapai cakupan dan kesadaran yang lebih luas dalam adaptasi TIK.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adi, S., & Heripracoyo, S. (2018). Village business intelligence (bi) design to support social welfare intervention programs by using GIS approach. 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 189–194. DOI:10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528130

Adi, S., & Suhartono, J. (2017). Smart village geographic information system (GIS) development in Indonesia and its analogous approaches. 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 65–70. DOI:10.1109/ICIMTech.2017.8273513

Afnarius, S., Syukur, M., Ekaputra, E. G., Parawita, Y., & Darman, R. (2020). Development of GIS for buildings in the customary village of minangkabau koto gadang, west Sumatra, Indonesia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(6), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9060365

Ashraf, M., Hanisch, J., & Swatman, P. (2009). ICT intervention in the ‘Chandanbari’Village of Bangladesh: Results from a field study. Information Systems Frontiers, 11, 155–166. DOI:10.1007/s10796-008-9133-0

Basu, S. (2004). E?government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779

Bifulco, F., Tregua, M., Amitrano, C. C., & D’Auria, A. (2016). ICT and sustainability in smart cities management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), 132–147. DOI:10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0132

Cooper, N. M., Lyndon, A., McLemore, M. R., & Asiodu, I. V. (2022). Social Construction of Target Populations: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Policy Approaches to Perinatal Illicit Substance Screening. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 23(1), 56–66. DOI: 10.1177/15271544211067781

Ella, S., & Andari, R. N. (2019). Utilization of ICT in Building a Smart Village Model for Village Development in Indonesia. 2019 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), 7, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS48059.2019.8969820

Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2013). Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development—Conceptual framework and state of research. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S94–S109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.001

Estevez, E., Janowski, T., & Dzhusupova, Z. (2013). Electronic governance for sustainable development: how EGOV solutions contribute to SD goals? Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479741

Finger, M., & Pécoud, G. (2003). From e Government to e Governance? Towards a model of e Governance. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 1(1), pp52-62.

Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. J. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Final Report.

Gultom, Y. (2021). Pola Politik Pembangunan Desa di Indonesia Pasca Hadirnya UU Desa No. 6 Tahun 2014 dan Politik Pembangunan Saemaul Undong di Korea Selatan Era Park Chung Hee (1963-1979). Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v13i2.6187

Hadian, N., & Susanto, T. D. (2022). Pengembangan Model Smart Village Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Information System,Graphics, Hospitality and Technology, 4(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.37823/insight.v4i2.234

Herdiana, D. (2019). Pengembangan Konsep Smart Village bagi Desa-Desa di Indonesia. IPTEK-KOM, 21(1). DOI:10.33164/iptekkom.21.1.2019.1-16

Hernandi, A., Suwardhi, D., Widyastuti, R., Handayani, A. P., & Harpiandi, A. (n.d.). Utilization of LADM for Smart Village Development in Indonesia.

Kurniawan. (2021). Evaluasi dampak dana desa terhadap pembangunan infrastruktur desa di indonesia. Forum Ekonomi, 23(3).

Marlintha, A. B., Irawan, B., & Latuconsina, R. (2017). Design and implementation of smart village mapping geographic information system based web in the cinunuk village. 2017 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile (APWiMob), 66–71. DOI:10.1109/APWiMob.2017.8284006

Milicevic, I., & Gareis, K. (2003). Disparities in ICT take-up and usage between EU Regions. Workshop ‘The Regional Effects of the New Information Economy’, Milano.

Okot-Uma, R. W., & London, C. S. (2000). Electronic governance: re-inventing good governance. Commonwealth Secretariat, London, 5.

Pick, J., Sarkar, A., & Parrish, E. (2018). Internet use and online activities in US States: geographic disparities and socio-economic influences. DOI:10.24251/HICSS.2018.485

Rachmawati, R. (2018). Pengembangan smart village untuk penguatan smart city dan smart regency. Jurnal Sistem Cerdas, 1(2), 12–19. DOI:10.37396/jsc.v1i2.9

Rastogi, N., & Trivedi, M. K. (2016). PESTLE technique–a tool to identify external risks in construction projects. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 3(1), 384–388.

Salim, A. (2013). Management Information in Rural Area: A Case Study of Rancasalak Village in Garut, Indonesia. Procedia Technology, 11, 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.187

Sari, T. P. (2019). The Role of Geospatial Information for Accelerating the Delineation of Village Boundaries in Indonesia using Cartometric Method. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 6(7). DOI:10.22161/ijaers.677

Schelin, S. H. (2007). E-government: an overview. Modern Public Information Technology Systems: Issues and Challenges, 110–126. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-051-6.ch006

Scholl, H. J., & AlAwadhi, S. (2016). Creating Smart Governance: The key to radical ICT overhaul at the City of Munich. Information Polity, 21(1), 21–42. DOI:10.3233/IP-150369

Sridhar, R., Sachithanandam, V., Mageswaran, T., Purvaja, R., Ramesh, R., Senthil Vel, A., & Thirunavukkarasu, E. (2016). A Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental (PESTLE) approach for assessment of coastal zone management practice in India. International Review of Public Administration, 21(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2016.1237091

Thadaboina, V. (2009). ICT and rural development: a study of Warana Wired Village Project in India. Transition Studies Review, 16, 560–570. DOI:10.1007/s11300-009-0092-z

Trilaksono, T., & Sukartini, N. M. (2020). Kaitan Karakteristik Perangkat Desa Dengan Indeks Pembangunan Desa Di Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v4i1.9916

Zalengera, C., Blanchard, R. E., Eames, P. C., Juma, A. M., Chitawo, M. L., & Gondwe, K. T. (2014). Overview of the Malawi energy situation and A PESTLE analysis for sustainable development of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 335–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.050