Peran ChatGPT Sebagai Artificial Intelligence Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Pertanahan dengan Metode Studi Kasus dan Black Box Testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v7i1.256Keywords:
pertanahan, kecerdasan buatan, bahasa pemrosesan alamiAbstract
In the current digital era, technology is rapidly advancing. One of the increasingly popular technologies being used is Artificial Intelligence (AI). ChatGPT is one of the AI chatbots, computer programs designed to mimic human interactions through chat or text. AI chatbots are now widely used in various sectors, including the legal industry. Land issues are a common legal problem in Indonesia. Handling land-related issues requires precise decision-making to minimize conflicts and expedite resolution. However, sometimes resolving land issues can be time-consuming and costly. The aim of this research is to provide a clearer perspective on the role of ChatGPT in addressing land issues and an understanding of its limitations. Testing of the free accessible version of ChatGPT is conducted using a black box testing method. The final results of the study indicate that ChatGPT has the potential to provide real-time and valuable information, helping the general public understand legal land issues. However, it is important to note that ChatGPT has limitations. ChatGPT cannot entirely replace the role of humans in making complex legal decisions, ChatGPT can only function as an informant providing general information.
Dalam era digital seperti saat ini, teknologi semakin berkembang pesat. Salah satu teknologi yang semakin populer digunakan adalah Artificial Intelligence (AI). ChatGPT merupakan salah satu chatbot AI, yaitu sebuah program komputer dirancang untuk meniru interaksi manusia melalui chat atau teks. Saat ini chatbot AI sudah banyak digunakan dalam berbagai sektor, termasuk sektor hukum. Pertanahan merupakan salah satu persoalan hukum yang sering terjadi di Indonesia. Menangani masalah pertanahan memerlukan dan pengambilan keputusan yang tepat agar dapat meminimalisir konflik dan mempercepat proses penyelesaian. Namun, terkadang penyelesaian masalah pertanahan memerlukan waktu yang lama dan biaya yang besar. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan pandangan yang lebih jelas tentang peran ChatGPT dalam menangani masalah pertanahan serta pemahaman akan keterbatasan-keterbatasannya. Pengujian dilakukan menggunakan ChatGPT versi gratis dengan metode black box testing. Hasil akhir menunjukkan bahwa ChatGPT memiliki potensi untuk memberikan informasi yang berguna secara real-time serta membantu masyarakat umum memahami isu-isu hukum pertanahan. Namun, penting untuk diingat bahwa ChatGPT memiliki keterbatasan. ChatGPT tidak dapat menggantikan peran manusia sepenuhnya dalam pengambilan keputusan hukum yang kompleks, ChatGPT hanya mampu berperan sebagai informan yang memberikan informasi bersifat umum.
Downloads
References
Aichernig, B. K. (2001). Systematic Black-Box Testing of Computer-Based Systems through Formal Abstraction Techniques. Dissertation. Technischen Universit ?at Graz. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=9d392111d2c34a5c1e59745b03cc45377bcc6cb5
Anwar, M. B. (2023). Pasar Sepi Imbas TikTok, Dosen UNAIR Ungkap Fakta Sebenarnya. Universitas Airlangga. https://unair.ac.id/pasar-sepi-imbas-tiktok-dosen-unair-ungkap-fakta-sebenarnya/
Apostolopoulos, I. D., Tzani, M., & Aznaouridis, S. I. (2023). ChatGPT: ascertaining the self-evident. The use of AI in generating human knowledge. arXiv:2308.06373. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.06373
Atabekov, A., & Yastrebov, O. (2018). Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence Across Countries: Legislation on The Move. European Research Studies Journal, 21(4), 773–782. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1245
Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for Higher Education and Professional Development: A Guide to Conversational AIGuide to Conversational AI. USA: University of Rhode Island. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1547&context=cba_facpubs
Az, L. S., & Yahyanto. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Setara Press, h.155. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lukman-Santoso-Az-2/publication/328304869_PENGANTAR_ILMU_HUKUM/links/5bc562faa6fdcc03c788d1b0/PENGANTAR-ILMU-HUKUM.pdf
Bathni, I., Darmawan, D., & Turkamun, D. (2021). Pengaruh Jual Beli Online Terhadap Pasar Tradisional Pedagang Pakaian dan Tas di Pasar Ciputat. Proceding Secretari Universitas Pamulang, 267–281. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/PSU/article/view/18682
Baumgartner, C. (2023). The Opportunities and Pitfalls of ChatGPT in Clinical and Translational Medicine. Clinical and Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.1206
Bo, Z. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Protection-Judicial Practice in Chinese Courts. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence/conversation_ip_ai/pdf/ms_china_1_en.pdf
Boboy, J. T., Santoso, B., & Irawati. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Berdasarkan Teori Dean G.Pruitt dan Jeffrey Z.Rubin. Notarius, 13(2), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31168
Bohannon, M. (2023). Lawyer Used ChatGPT In Court—And Cited Fake Cases. A Judge Is Considering Sanctions. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2023/06/08/lawyer-used-chatgpt-in-court-and-cited-fake-cases-a-judge-is-considering-sanctions/?sh=170531c57c7f
Brown, R. D. (2021). Property Ownership and The Legal Personhood of Artificial Intelligence. Information and Communications Technology Law, 30(2), 208–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1861714
Chinonso, O. E., Theresa, A. M., & Aduke, T. C. (2023). ChatGPT for Teaching, Learning and Research: Prospects and Challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. (2023). Leadership Is Needed for Ethical ChatGPT: Character, Assessment, and Learning Using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02
Danendra, D. R., Kid Manopo, E. C., Hendry Wijaya, O., & Tanuwijaya, Y. (2022). Kesadaran Etis Dalam Penggunaan Aplikasi Berlisensi Secara Ilegal (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Pradita University Pada Tahun 2022). Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humanioral, 1(1), 115–137. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/48
Darman, R. (2023). Analisis Sentimen Respons Twitter terhadap Persyaratan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) di Kantor Pertanahan. Widya Bhumi, 3(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.31292/wb.v3i2.61
Darmawan, R., & Amini, S. (2022). Perbandingan Hasil Sentimen Analysis Menggunakan Algoritma Naïve Bayes dan K-Nearest Neighbor pada Twitter. Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Fakultas Teknologi Informasi (SENAFTI). https://senafti.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/senafti/article/download/210/48/4158
Dönmez, I., Idil, S., & Gulen, S. (2023). Conducting Academic Research With The AI Interface ChatGPT: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Art Education, 6(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.55290/steam.1263404
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Carter, L., Chowdhury, S., Crick, T., Cunningham, S. W., Davies, G. H., Davison, R. M., Dé, R., Dennehy, D., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Flavián, C., Gauld, R., Grover, V., Hu, M. C., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Junglas, I., Khorana, S., Kraus, S., Larsen, K. R., Latreille, P., Laumer, S., Malik, F. T., Mardani, A., Mariani, M., Mithas, S., Mogaji, E., Nord, J. H., O’Connor, S., Okumus, F., Pagani, M., Pandey, N., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I. O., Pathak, N., Pries-Heje, J., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Rehm, S. V., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Richter, A., Rowe, F., Sarker, S., Stahl, B. C., Tiwari, M. K., van der Aalst, W., Venkatesh, V., Viglia, G., Wade, M., Walton, P., Wirtz, J., & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT Wrote It?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Federiko, Y. (2021). Pengaruh Persepsi Nilai, Persepsi Kualitas, Loyalitas Merek dan Kepercayaan Merek Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Paket Premium Aplikasi Streaming Musik Spotify. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/26211/
Fostikov, A. (2023). First Impressions on Using AI Powered Chatbots, Tools and Search Engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity and Other Possibilities and Usage Problems. Pregled NCD, 42. https://doi.org/10.17613/9t6p-2229
Francia, O. A. A., Nunez-del-Prado, M., & Alatrista-Salas, H. (2022). Survey of Text Mining Techniques Applied to Judicial Decisions Prediction. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010200
Gemilang, C. C. (2022). Analisis Motivasi Pembelian Dalam Aplikasi Menggunakan Pendekatan Expectation Confirmatory Model. UPN Veteran Jawa Timur. http://repository.upnjatim.ac.id/8461/
Gupta, B. B. (2022). Discovering the Boundless Potential of ChatGPT?: The AI Language Model. Data Science Insights Magazine, 3, 15–20. https://insights2techinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Discoveringthe-Boundless-Potential-of-ChatGPT-The-AI-Language-Model.pdf
Hernowo, W. S., & Aufa, M. F. (2021). Dewan Pengawas Syariah Koperasi Syariah dalam Bias Pengaturannya. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(2), 377. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.32360
Huh, S. (2023). Are ChatGPT’s Knowledge and Interpretation Ability Comparable to Those of Medical Students in Korea for Taking a Parasitology Examination?: A Descriptive Study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.01
Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 314. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711
Jauhari, E. (2011). Peranan BPN Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Yang Bersifat Declaratoir (Studi Kasus Putusan PN Semarang Nomor 102/Pdt.G/2004.PN.Smg). Tesis. Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Diponegoro. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/52019
Kansil, V. (2023). Kontroversial TikTokShop Dalam Perdagangan Indonesia . Binus University Business School. https://bbs.binus.ac.id/exed/2023/09/26/1932/
Khan, M. E. (2011). Different Approaches to White Box Testing Technique for Finding Errors. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 2(4), 32. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2011.2404
Khanna, E. (2017). On The Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in Black Box Testing. 9(5), 165–169. http://www.enggjournals.com/ijcse/doc/IJCSE17-09-05-033.pdf
Krausová, A. (2017). Intersections Between Law and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Computer (IJC), 27(1), 55–68. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229656008.pdf
Kumar, M., Singh, S. K., & Dwivedi, R. K. (2015). A Comparative Study of Black Box Testing and White Box Testing Techniques. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 3(10), 33. https://ijarcsms.com/docs/paper/volume3/issue10/V3I10-0018.pdf
Laksono, M. Y. (2021). Kurun 2018-2020, Ada 3.145 Kasus Sengketa Pertanahan yang Belum Diselesaikan. kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/properti/read/2021/10/06/090000721/kurun-2018-2020-ada-3.145-kasus-sengketa-pertanahan-yang-belum?page=all
Laturette, A. I. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Ulayat Pada Kawasan Hutan. Sasi, 27(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.504
Lo, D. (2021). Can AI Replace a Judge in The Courtroom? University of New South Wales, Sydney Newsroom. https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/business-law/can-ai-replace-judge-courtroom
Mahaputra, I. B. G. A., Putra, I. M. A. M., & Mandasari, I. A. C. S. (2023). Perlidungan Hukum Kemitraan Ojek Online dengan Driver Pasca Diberlakukannya Undang-undang Cipta Kerja. Kertha Wicaksana, 17(2), 114–122. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/kertawicaksana/article/view/7582
Marpi, Y. (2020). Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT. Zona Media Mandiri, h.39. https://jdih.situbondokab.go.id/barang/buku/Ilmu%20hukum%20suatu%20pengantar%20by%20Yapiter%20Marpi%20(z-lib.org).pdf
Mauludin, N. A. (2022). Faktor Penyebab Dan Upaya Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan di Desa Bilelando Kecamatan Praya Timur Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. Jurnal Ganec Swara, 16(2), 1572–1577. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v16i2.321
Melo, O. E., Kapoh, H., Kimbal, A. A., Lintong, O., Putong, I., & Wenas, P. (2021). Software Testing using the Black Box Method: Case study - Pioneer Tourism Web in Southeast Minahasa. International Journal of Computer Applications, 174(13), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2021921020
Muliani, S., Sembiring, R. D., & Eresina P, D. (2022). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Penggunaan Transportasi Ojek Online Go-Jek di Kota Medan. Jurnal Ruang Luar dan Dalam, 3(1), 35–41. https://ejurnal.istp.ac.id/index.php/jrld/article/view/161
Muliawan, J. W. (2018). Cara Mudah Pahami Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Melalui Konsep 3 in 1 in the Land Acquisition. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 1(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.122018.163-182
Munfarid, H., Kuswahyono, I., & Suhariningsih. (2014). Implikasi Yuridis Jual Beli Tanah Yang Tidak Dilakukan Di Hadapan PPAT Terhadap Proses Pendaftaran dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah (Analisis Putusan No. 18/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Lmg). Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/654
Nazifah, N., Yanti, H., & Iqbal, M. (2022). Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Jambi. Wajah Hukum, 6(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i1.1027
Nurdin, M. (2018). Akar Konflik Pertanahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 3(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v3i2.2897
Nuripah, S., Gunawan, & Rochana, T. (2023). Anak Muda dan Go-Ride (Kajian Gaya Hidup Digital Pengguna Jasa Transportasi Ojek Daring di Kota Semarang). Journal of Indonesian Social Studies Education, 1(1), 74–85. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/JISSE/article/view/72615
Nurlinda, Marhawati, Supatminingsih, T., Rahmatullah, & Rijal, S. (2022). Dampak Keberadaan Pasar Modern Terhadap Pendapatan Pedagang Pasar Tradisional (Studi Kasus Pedagang Pasar Sentral Pangkep Kabupaten Pangkajene Kepulauan). Journal of Economic Education and Entrepreneurship Studies, 3(2), 396–413. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JE3S/article/view/37138
Nurningtias, A. S. (2018). Akta Jual Beli Yang Berdasar Dari Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Waris Yang Terdaftar Dalam Harta Wasiat Yang Tidak Diketahui Para Ahli Waris. Tesis. Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Brawijaya. repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/177767/
Patricia, Z., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2021). Work Engagement Pengemudi Ojek Online Gojek: Kaitannya Dengan Resiliensi. Psibernetika, 14(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.30813/psibernetika.v14i2.2903
Peng, K., Ding, L., Zhong, Q., Shen, L., Liu, X., Zhang, M., Ouyang, Y., & Tao, D. (2023). Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translation. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4390455
Pettit, H. (2018). The AI That is Faster and More Accurate than Top Human Lawyers When Spotting Legal Issues in Contracts. Dailymail. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5435479/The-AI-outperforms-human-lawyers.html
Prabaningrum, A. D. A., Astuti, M., & Tjiptaningsih, D. S. (2020). Aplikasi Streaming Music Spotify: Harga, Citra Merek, Minat Beli. Konferensi Riset Nasional Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 864–880. https://ocs.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/korelasi/2020/paper/view/1011/161
Pratiwi, A. C., & Dwiyanto, B. M. (2021). Pengaruh Perceived Value Terhadap Purchase Intention Digital Music Streaming Services Dengan Satisfaction Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi pada Aplikasi Joox dan Spotify). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 9(1). https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/djom/article/view/30298/25152
Rahmayanti, N. P., & Karsudjono, A. J. (2023). Analisis Perbedaan Pendapatan Gojek Sebelum dan Sesudah Pandemi Covid-19. Media Mahardika, 21(2), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.29062/mahardika.v21i2.530
Rohimah, A. (2018). Era Digitalisasi Media Pemasaran Online dalam Gugurnya Pasar Ritel Konvensional. KANAL: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(2), 91–100. https://kanal.umsida.ac.id/index.php/kanal/article/view/1653
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or The End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Sabella, J. J. (2021). Penerapan Strategi Freemium pada Aplikasi Permainan Ponsel Online. Jurnal InterAct, 10(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.25170/interact.v10i1.2007
Saleh, M., Arif, M., & Aminuddin. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Go-Jek Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Studi Kasus Pengguna Layanan Jasa Go-Ride di Kota Makassar. YUME?: Journal of Management, 5(1), 188–193. https://journal.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/yume/article/view/1947
Samosir, D. (1992). Fungsi Pidana Penjara Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Bandung: Binacipta, h.3. https://repository.unpar.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/5396/Djisman_70210-p.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Setiawan, A., & Luthfiyani, U. K. (2023). Penggunaan ChatGPT Untuk Pendidikan di Era Education 4.0: Usulan Inovasi Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Adi Setiawan 1 , Ulfah Khairiyah Luthfiyani 2. JURNAL PETISI (Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi), 4(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpetisi.v4i1.3680
Setiawan, I. (2018). Analisis Tentang Ketentuan Tindak Pidana Pertanahan Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 6(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.25157/jigj.v6i1.1242
Sherly. (2023). Pakar Ekonomi Digital UI: Sepinya Pengunjung di Pasar Tanah Abang Lebih Kompleks dari Sekedar Masalah Digitalisasi. Universitas Indonesia. https://www.ui.ac.id/pakar-ekonomi-digital-ui-sepinya-pengunjung-di-pasar-tanah-abang-lebih-kompleks-dari-sekedar-masalah-digitalisasi/
Shi, C., Sourdin, T., & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.367
Sihombing, E. N. A. M., & Syaputra, M. Y. A. (2020). Implementasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.419-434
Sukmawati, P. D. (2022). Hukum Agraria dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 2(2), 89–95. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIH/article/view/1015
Syahputra, H. (2017). Analisis Penyelesaian Konflik Pertanahan Masyarakat Kelompok Tani Makmur Sejati (KTMS) Desa Kiyap Jaya dengan HGU PT. CDSL Dikecamatan Bandar Sei Kijang Kabupaten Pelalawan (Studi Kasus di Desa Lubuk Ogong). Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/18963/
Tabuni, O. (2022). Problematika Pengesampingan Kaidah dalam UU PTUN Melalui Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019. Tesis. Universitas KSW. h.36. https://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/27984/
Tias, R. F. (2020). Applications Learning Musical Instruments in Indonesia Using Augmented Reality Technology. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 5(2), 899–904. https://jeecs.ubhara.ac.id/index.php/JeecsV5N2/article/viewFile/177/193
Trialmawati, E., & Hartini. (2021). Mahasiswa Driver Ojek Online (Grab) Universitas Halu Oleo. Kabanti: Jurnal Kerabat Antropologi, 5(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.33772/kabanti.v5i2.1274
Tunggele, H. N. (2022). Etika Periklanan, Studi Kasus pada Iklan Grab Bike. CITRAWIRA?: Journal of Advertising and Visual Communication, 3(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.33153/citrawira.v3i2.4640
Wahana, P. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Diamond, h.133-135. https://repository.usd.ac.id/7333/1/3.%20Filsafat%20Ilmu%20Pengetahuan%20%20(B-3).pdf
Wang, N., & Tian, M. Y. (2022). “Intelligent Justice”: Human-Centered Considerations in China’s Legal AI Transformation. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00202-3
Widya, A. T., Bachtiar, J. C. U., Rahmadyani, H., Rahardiyan, A., Ananda B.P, T., & Abadi, A. A. (2020). Dampak Bisnis Online Terhadap Sosial-Ekonomi dan Karakteristik Ruang Dalam Rumah Tinggal di Cibaduyut, Kota Bandung. Modul, 20(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.20.1.2020.98-110
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research Design and Methods Fourth Edition. New York: SAGE Publications. http://cemusstudent.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/YIN_K_ROBERT-1.pdf
Yunia, N. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Kepemilikan Tanah Secara ADR di Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Probolinggo). Tesis. Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Islam Malang. http://repository.unisma.ac.id/jspui/bitstream/123456789/3806/1/S2_PASCASARJANA_KENOTARIATAN_22002022031_NENI YUNIA.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ridho Darman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
